Why Images Speak Before Words

How Visuals Unlock Thinking That Language Cannot Reach

"A picture tells a thousand words."

It is a phrase we repeat casually, rarely stopping to test whether it is true. Yet experience suggests something close to it is. We kind of know it's right.

A strong image grabs our attention immediately. Not because it explains, but because it presents something for us to interpret and ponder. It does not ask permission, nor present a way of thinking to us. It simply arrives, we take it in, we think, we ask questions of it and, if the image is a good one, it moves us.

Think of all those iconic album covers, the photographs that defined eras, images that we remember long after we saw them. They do not present an argument in so much as they simply show us something – the argument is often internal, in our own mind. They simple show. And in showing something, they allow meaning to form in ways that explanation often cannot.

How visuals unlock thinking that language cannot reach

In work, attention is one of our rarest resources and it is often squandered with remarkable ease. We work on work that doesn't need anyone to work on it. We move in a direction that nobody really set, often to find we were wrong. We have competing priorities, overloaded backlogs and people asking for more with less. We drown people in slides, documents, frameworks, and messages – all competing for cognitive space. Work piles on work, words pile on words, slide decks compete with slide decks. It's no wonder we're becoming increasing disengaged and jaded with work.

Images behave differently though. They cut through a lot of the noise and they grab us. They land with us. They give the brain something to process that doesn't happen with words. This is why visual artefacts – photographs, sketches, diagrams – have underpinned every serious attempt I have seen to bring clarity to complexity. By creating an image in someone's mind, we invite people to see that work, that future, that clarity more easily.

The Cow

Imagine trying to explain what a cow is to someone who does not share your language.

You could describe its size, its shape, its different colours, the food it eats, the sound it makes – but without a shared vocabulary, the explanation becomes quickly confusing. Although it's fair to say the "moo" a cow makes might well be universally understood.

However, show that same person a photograph of a cow, of which I seem to have a weird interest in snapping, and recognition is immediate. Shape, texture, context – all of it communicates instantly, bypassing the need for language entirely.

That is not a trivial observation from someone who likes taking pictures of cows. It points to something scientifically structural about how images work: they transmit meaning through a different channel than language, one that is faster, more shared across culture (not all cultures though), and less dependent on expertise or verbal confidence or the right choice of words.

Which is really interesting, and powerful, as we'll get to in a minute, because they can help you be creative, solve problems and develop breakthrough much quicker than words ever will.

Observation and interpretation – the gap where meaning lives

When we encounter an image, we do two things at once.

First, we register what is literally present – the shapes, subjects, light, arrangement, objects. This is observation. What is factually, objectively there in the photo. We can describe everything we see with ease using words. This, in scientific terms, is called Realism.

Then, often without realising it, we begin to imagine what sits behind what we see. This is especially prevalent when the photo doesn't have any narrative or description with it.

We compose the story, the intent and the emotions behind the photo. We try to understand the moment before or after the shutter clicked. Why did they take this? What was the photographer aiming to communicate with this? Why this photo? What was left out of the frame?

This is interpretation. It's sense making. It's contextual. What the image might mean, given who we are and what we bring to it. We refer to this in scientific terms as Conventionalism.

The power lies in the gap between those two things. What is there grounds us in reality. What might be there opens thought, wonder, imagination and creativity.

A photograph holds both without resolving them for us – and that unresolved quality is what makes it useful as a thinking tool in life and work. Language tends to close things down as we define things. The more we try to define things, the more definitions we need, the more words we need, the more detail we end up with – until we have a sea of text and a locked in narrow space to play within, and, crucially, we tend to achieve less understanding too.

Words encode expertise and hierarchy and power – some voices have more authority, others retreat, others are too narrow in their definitions.

Images do not care who you are – they ask only that you look. And in doing so, they give different types of intelligence space to surface.

Using images in workshops

Most organisational problems are often not technical, and therefore not easily solved with rational approaches. They are interpretive, they are human, they are relational, they are systemic and they often resist obvious narrow solutions. People see the same situation differently, or interpret words differently. They hold unspoken assumptions that lead to misdirection and a lack of clarity. They struggle to articulate what feels obvious but slippery. The work is a system that people tend to only see one part of, and often aren't always appreciative of the other parts.

Language often hardens these differences, defines them too narrowly and positions form.

Images soften them – because an image does not insist on a single meaning. It gives people something shared and lets interpretation surface safely from different perspectives. What emerges is not consensus first, but insights, awareness and understanding. And understanding precedes alignment.

This is why I use photographs in workshops, strategy sessions, and creative problem-solving work. I use them in my own creative work too – as thinking tools. They help people talk about things that are hard to name directly – risk, change, tension, possibility – not by defining them, but by letting people recognise them and share what they see.

Visual Explorer Cards — a practical application

The most structured form of this I use regularly is a set of image cards originally developed by the Center for Creative Leadership, known as Visual Explorer Cards.

Each card is a photograph without caption, date, or commentary – purely visual. The absence of context is deliberate. It forces participants to engage actively with what they see rather than respond to a label. To access both Realism and Conventionalism.

The process in a workshop typically follows this shape:

We define the problem we're trying to resolve. Participants choose a card intuitively – the selection itself often reveals something about how they are currently thinking about the problem. Then they separate two things: the content (what is literally there — the subjects, objects, composition, colours) and the assumed context (what might be happening, what story the image suggests, what emotions or meanings it evokes).

Combining those two responses in a group produces something surprising and powerful.

Abstract words emerge from concrete images – words like "local," "speed," "self-sufficient," "solitude," "resilience." These become the raw material for ideas.

In one leadership workshop, a team working on a struggling product concept used this process and arrived at a product that was low-energy, fast-charging, and designed for local markets – none of which had been on the table before the session. The words had come from the images. The images had unlocked the thinking that discussion alone had not.

In another session, after a long and difficult strategy day, I asked each person to choose an image that represented how they felt about the strategy they had developed. What surfaced in that sharing – the misalignments, the fears, the unexpected enthusiasm – was more honest and more useful than another round of verbal debrief would have been. Images made it safe to say things that felt too exposed to say directly.

How to run this yourself

You do not need a professional image set. Random everyday photographs work equally well – the magic is in the process, not the production quality of the cards. A basic version of this activity:

• Gather a set of images – a mix of subjects, moods, environments. No captions.
• Spread them out and ask each person to choose one that draws them, without overthinking.
• Give everyone a few minutes to note: what is literally in the image, and what story or feeling does it suggest?
• Share those observations as a group.
• Look for connections, patterns, surprising overlaps.
• Ask how any of this connects to the problem, challenge, or question you are working on.

The connection will not always be obvious. That is fine. The point is not to find the answer in the image. It is to access a part of the thinking that language was blocking.

Beyond language

Language is powerful – but it is not neutral. Words come preloaded with culture, hierarchy, expertise, and confidence. Some voices dominate. Others retire to the corner of the room.

Images level the field. They do not privilege the most articulate speaker. They invite contribution from people who think visually, who hold strong ideas they have not yet found words for, who are ahead of the conversation but cannot yet say where.

We live in a world overloaded with explanation and starving for sense-making and understanding. Images offer a different route – one that begins with attention, moves through observation, and arrives at insight without forcing it.

They do not replace language. They prepare the ground for it.

Sometimes the most effective way to move thinking forward is not to say more – but to show something worth seeing. Maybe using a photo of a cow.

Bibliography

Bakhshi, S., Shamma, D., Kennedy, L., Gilbert, E., 2015. Why We Filter Our Photos and How It Impacts Engagement. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 9, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v9i1.14622

Bell, B.T., 2019. “You take fifty photos, delete forty nine and use one”: A qualitative study of adolescent image-sharing practices on social media. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 20, 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2019.03.002

Burkholder, C., 2016. On Keeping Public Visual Fieldnotes As Reflexive Ethnographic Practice. McGill Journal of Education 51. https://doi.org/10.7202/1038609ar

“Creative Infographics: Between Art and Journalism”. Design online course by Jaime Serra Palou [WWW Document], n.d. . Domestika. URL https://www.domestika.org/en/courses/386-creative-infographics-between-art-and-journalism/course (accessed 7.16.23).

Eklund, A., 2024. Using Images as Metaphors for Creative Thinking. Andy Eklund. URL https://andyeklund.com/using-images-as-metaphors-for-creative-thinking/ (accessed 7.29.24).

Gómez Cruz, E., Ardevol, E., 2013. Some ethnographic notes on a Flickr group. Photographies 6. https://doi.org/10.1080/17540763.2013.788836

Haidri, R., 2020. Changing Focus: Using Photography to Prompt Creative Writing.Reading visual images [WWW Document], n.d. . Open Learning. URL https://www.open.edu/openlearn/society-politics-law/sociology/reading-visual-images/content-section-0?intro=1 (accessed 7.23.24).

Ruijter, J. de, 2017. How a Random Image can help you to generate creative ideas. HatRabbits. URL https://hatrabbits.com/en/random-image/ (accessed 7.29.24).

Schifanella, R., Redi, M., Aiello, L.M., 2015. An Image Is Worth More than a Thousand Favorites: Surfacing the Hidden Beauty of Flickr Pictures. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 9, 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v9i1.14612

Sung, Y., Lee, J.-A., Kim, E., Choi, S.M., 2016. Why we post selfies: Understanding motivations for posting pictures of oneself. Personality and Individual Differences 97, 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.032

Xia, H., Pan, X., Zhou, Y., Zhang, Z. (Justin), 2020. Creating the best first impression: Designing online product photos to increase sales. Decision Support Systems 131, 113235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2019.113235